DAVID A. ZIGRAY, Plaintiff, v. NETDELIVERY CORP., a Delaware corporation, IDK ENTERPRISES, INC., a Delaware corporation d/b/a NETdelivery, COMPLETE SECURITY SOLUTIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, PATRON SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, and DANIEL TWING, an individual, Defendants.

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01624-WYD-BNB.United States District Court, D. Colorado.
March 6, 2006

ORDER
BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before me on Defendants’ Motion to Strike
[Doc. # 23, filed 2/27/06] (the “Motion”). Defendants seek an order striking Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [Doc. # 22, filed 2/27/06] (the “Sur-Reply”).

On January 6, 2006, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”). The plaintiff filed a response to the Motion to Dismiss on January 27, 2006. The defendants filed a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss on February 13, 2006. On February 27, 2006, the plaintiff filed the Sur-Relpy.

The local rules of this court provide that there shall be a motion, a response, and a reply. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Further briefing is not permitted without leave of court. The plaintiff has not sought leave to file a sur-reply, nor does it appear that further briefing is necessary.

Page 2

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Strike is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is STRICKEN.

Page 1