Civil Action No. 05-cv-01624-WYD-BNB.United States District Court, D. Colorado.
March 6, 2006
BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge
This matter is before me on Defendants’ Motion to Strike
[Doc. # 23, filed 2/27/06] (the “Motion”). Defendants seek an order striking Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Subject Matter Jurisdiction [Doc. # 22, filed 2/27/06] (the “Sur-Reply”).
On January 6, 2006, the defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (the “Motion to Dismiss”). The plaintiff filed a response to the Motion to Dismiss on January 27, 2006. The defendants filed a reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss on February 13, 2006. On February 27, 2006, the plaintiff filed the Sur-Relpy.
The local rules of this court provide that there shall be a motion, a response, and a reply. D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C. Further briefing is not permitted without leave of court. The plaintiff has not sought leave to file a sur-reply, nor does it appear that further briefing is necessary.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Strike is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Subject Matter Jurisdiction is STRICKEN.