Civil No. JFM-08-2859.United States District Court, D. Maryland.
October 19, 2009
ORDER
J. MOTZ, District Judge
For the reasons stated in the Memorandum being entered herewith, it is, this 19th day of October 2009
ORDERED
1. The motion to dismiss filed by defendant is granted for Counts IV, V, VI, VIII, IX, X, XII, XIII, XIV, XVI, XVII, XVIII, XX, XXI, XXII, XXIII, XXIV, XXV, XXVII, XXVIII, XXIX, XXXI, XXXII, and XXXIII, and these Counts are hereby dismissed; and
2. The motion for summary judgment filed by defendant is granted for Counts I, II, III, VII, XI, XV, XIX, XXVI, XXX, XXXIV, XXXV, XXXVI, XXXVII, XXXXVIII, and judgment is entered in favor of defendant against plaintiff on these Counts.
Page 1
968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997) Annette M. ABRAHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AGUSTA, S.P.A, et al.,…
568 F.Supp. 692 (1983) Andreas PAPAFAGOS, et al. v. FIAT AUTO, S.p.A., et al. Civ.…
457 F.Supp.3d 313 (2020) ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., Defendant. 18-cv-5473…
228 F.Supp.3d 302 (2017) Lisa LEE, Plaintiff, v. AIR CANADA and John Doe, True Name…
Nov 1, 1939 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 1 F.R.D.…
Oct 15, 2001 · United States District Court for the District of Maine · No. CIV. 98-186-PH 203 F.R.D.…