UNITED STATES v. NELSON, 21-MJ-00747 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 29, 2021)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff,
v.
STEPHANY NELSON, Defendant.

No. 5:21-MJ-00747-DUTY

United States District Court, C.D. California

December 29, 2021

          ORDER OF DETENTION PENDING FURTHER REVOCATION PROCEEDINGS (FED. R. CRIM. P. 32.1(a)(6); 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1))

SHASHI H. KEWALRAMANI, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The defendant having been arrested in this District pursuant to a warrant issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of California for alleged violation(s) of the terms and conditions of probation or supervised release; and

Having conducted a detention hearing pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1(a)(6) and 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(1), the Court finds that:

A. (x) The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to flee if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on the following:
(x) information in the Pretrial Services Report and Recommendation
(x) information in the violation petition and report(s)
() the defendant’s nonobjection to detention at this time
(x) other: Defendant is amenable to dual diagnosis residential facility
1

and/ or
B. () The defendant has not met his/her burden of establishing by clear and convincing evidence that he/she is not likely to pose a danger to the safety of any other person or the community if released under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(b) or (c). This finding is based on the following:
() information in the Pretrial Services Report and Recommendation
() information in the violation petition and report(s)
() the defendant’s nonobjection to detention at this time
(x) other: Defendant is amenable to dual diagnosis residential facility
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that the defendant be detained pending the further revocation proceedings.

2…
United States v. Nelson (C.D. Cal. 2021)

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

ABRAHAM v. AGUSTA, 968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997)

968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997) Annette M. ABRAHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AGUSTA, S.P.A, et al.,…

3 weeks ago

PAPAFAGOS v. FIAT AUTO, SpA, 568 F.Supp. 692 (1983)

568 F.Supp. 692 (1983) Andreas PAPAFAGOS, et al. v. FIAT AUTO, S.p.A., et al. Civ.…

3 weeks ago

ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., 457 F.Supp.3d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

457 F.Supp.3d 313 (2020) ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., Defendant. 18-cv-5473…

3 weeks ago

LEE v. AIR CANADA, 228 F.Supp.3d 302 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

228 F.Supp.3d 302 (2017) Lisa LEE, Plaintiff, v. AIR CANADA and John Doe, True Name…

1 month ago

UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA, 1 F.R.D. 1 (1939)

Nov 1, 1939 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 1 F.R.D.…

1 month ago

RAMIREZ v. DECOSTER, 203 F.R.D. 30 (D. Ma. 2001)

Oct 15, 2001 · United States District Court for the District of Maine · No. CIV. 98-186-PH 203 F.R.D.…

1 month ago