UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff v. WILLIAM DAVIS, III Defendant.

Case No. 5:05 cr 131.United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.
July 17, 2006

ORDER ACCEPTING PLEA AGREEMENT AND JUDGMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING
LESLEY WELLS, District Judge

This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. regarding the change of plea hearing and plea agreement of William Davis, III which was referred to the Magistrate Judge with the consent of the parties.

On 16 March 2005, the government filed a one-count indictment against William Davis, III for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute and distribution of a controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. On 14 April 2005, a hearing was held in which William Davis, III entered a plea of not guilty before Magistrate Judge Patricia A. Hemann. On 22 May 2006, Magistrate Judge Baughman received William Davis, III’s plea of guilty and issued a Report and Recommendation (“RR”) concerning whether the plea should be accepted and a finding of guilty entered.

Page 2

Neither party submitted objections to the Magistrate Judge’s RR in the ten days after it was issued.

On de novo review of the record, the Magistrate Judge’s RR is adopted. William Davis, III is found to be competent to enter a plea. He understands his constitutional rights. He is aware of the charges and of the consequences of entering a plea. There is an adequate factual basis for the plea. The Court finds the plea was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. The plea agreement is approved.

Therefore, William Davis, III is adjudged guilty of Count One, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Sentencing will be:

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Page 1