CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 4-10.United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division at London.
February 2, 2007
OPINION ORDER
KAREN CALDWELL, District Judge
This matter is before the Court on the Defendant’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (Rec. No. 121). The matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for consideration.
On November 27, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed his Report and Recommendation (Rec. 144). Based on a review of the record and applicable law, the Magistrate Judge recommended that Defendant’s motion should be denied with prejudice and that a certificate of appealability should not be issued.
Defendant has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Rec. No. 145). This Court must make a de novo
determination of those portions of the Magistrate Judge’s proposed report and recommendation to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Court has considered the Defendant’s objections and, after having examined the record and conducting de novo review of them, the Court finds the objections to be without merit.
Accordingly, the Court, being otherwise sufficiently advised,HEREBY ORDERS that:
Page 1