MORSE E. STEWART, Plaintiff, v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; FIRST HORIZON HOME LOAN CORPORATION; FIRST HORIZON NATIONAL CORPORATION FIRST TENNESSEE BANK; FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; FIRST PACIFIC MORTGAGE COMPANY, INC., Defendants.

Civil Case No. 09-688-PK.United States District Court, D. Oregon, Portland Division.
March 19, 2010

ORDER Morse Edward Stewart, Vernonia, Oregon, Pro Se Plaintiff.

Page 2

Teresa M. Shill, Routh Crabtree Olsen, PC, Lake Oswego, Oregon, Attorney for Defendants.

GARR KING, District Judge

The Honorable Paul Papak, United States Magistrate Judge, filed Findings and Recommendation on February 18, 2010. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Findings and Recommendation.

When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation concerning a dispositive motion or prisoner petition, the district court must make a de novo
determination of that portion of the magistrate’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); McDonnell DouglasCorp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313
(9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). This court has, therefore, given de novo review of the rulings of Magistrate Judge Papak.

This court ADOPTS the Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Papak (#34) dated February 18, 2010 in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (#26, #30) are granted.

Page 1

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *