No. CIV.S-06-1345 MCE DAD PS.United States District Court, E.D. California.
October 5, 2006
ORDER
DALE DROZD, Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff, proceeding in this action pro se, initiated this action by filing his complaint on June 19, 2006. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
While it appears that plaintiff may have intended to request leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, plaintiff has not filed the appropriate application in this regard. Plaintiff has submitted two copies of his complaint but no application to proceed in forma pauperis.
Page 2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of the date of this order plaintiff shall pay the appropriate filing fee or submit an affidavit making the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit along with a copy of this order.
Page 1