CIVIL ACTION 11-0050-CG-M.United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division.
May 20, 2011
ORDER
CALLIE GRANADE, District Judge
After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made[1] , the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) is ADOPTED
as the opinion of this Court. It is ORDERED that this action be and is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
DONE and ORDERED.
968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997) Annette M. ABRAHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AGUSTA, S.P.A, et al.,…
568 F.Supp. 692 (1983) Andreas PAPAFAGOS, et al. v. FIAT AUTO, S.p.A., et al. Civ.…
457 F.Supp.3d 313 (2020) ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., Defendant. 18-cv-5473…
228 F.Supp.3d 302 (2017) Lisa LEE, Plaintiff, v. AIR CANADA and John Doe, True Name…
Nov 1, 1939 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 1 F.R.D.…
Oct 15, 2001 · United States District Court for the District of Maine · No. CIV. 98-186-PH 203 F.R.D.…