KOVACS v. NATIONAL HEBREW GLATT, INC. (S.D.Fla. 7-2-2008)

ISTAN KOVACS Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL HEBREW GLATT, INC., and HANA KOOT, Defendants.

Case No. 05-23125-CIV-HUCK/O’SULLIVAN.United States District Court, S.D. Florida.
July 2, 2008

ORDER
JOHN O’SULLIVAN, Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER came before the Court on Counsel for Third Parties’ Unopposed Motion to Withdraw (DE# 194, 6/17/08) and Third Party Shapiro’s Motion to Appear Pro Se (DE# 195, 6/19/08). Having reviewed the applicable filings and law, it is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Counsel for Third Parties’ Unopposed Motion to Withdraw (DE# 194, 6/17/08) is GRANTED.

1. Third party K S Foods, LLC., will be allowed until July16, 2008, to retain new counsel, and for said counsel to enter a formal appearance with this Court.

2. Paul F. Penichet, P.A. is permitted to withdraw from future representation of K S Foods, LLC., effective July 16, 2008 or upon appearance of new counsel, which ever occurs first.

3. In the event that K S Foods, LLC., fails to retain new counsel, K S Foods, LLC., will not be permitted to defend itself in this action because K S Foods, LLC., is a corporation and cannot proceed pro se. See Palazzo v. Gulf Oil Corp., 764 F.2d 1381, 1385 (11th Cir. 1985) (“The rule is well established that a corporation is an artificial entity that can act only through its agents, cannot appear pro se, and must be represented by counsel.”).

Page 2

4. Attorney Paul F. Penichet shall promptly notify his clients of this order by mailing or serving a copy on Akiva Shapiro and on a corporate representative of K S Foods, LLC., it is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Third Party Shapiro’s Motion to Appear Pro Se (DE# 195, 6/19/08) is GRANTED. Third party Akiva Shapiro shall appear before the Court only on his own behalf.

DONE AND ORDERED, in Chambers, in Miami, Florida.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

ABRAHAM v. AGUSTA, 968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997)

968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997) Annette M. ABRAHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AGUSTA, S.P.A, et al.,…

1 week ago

PAPAFAGOS v. FIAT AUTO, SpA, 568 F.Supp. 692 (1983)

568 F.Supp. 692 (1983) Andreas PAPAFAGOS, et al. v. FIAT AUTO, S.p.A., et al. Civ.…

1 week ago

ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., 457 F.Supp.3d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

457 F.Supp.3d 313 (2020) ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., Defendant. 18-cv-5473…

1 week ago

LEE v. AIR CANADA, 228 F.Supp.3d 302 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

228 F.Supp.3d 302 (2017) Lisa LEE, Plaintiff, v. AIR CANADA and John Doe, True Name…

3 weeks ago

UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA, 1 F.R.D. 1 (1939)

Nov 1, 1939 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 1 F.R.D.…

3 weeks ago

RAMIREZ v. DECOSTER, 203 F.R.D. 30 (D. Ma. 2001)

Oct 15, 2001 · United States District Court for the District of Maine · No. CIV. 98-186-PH 203 F.R.D.…

3 weeks ago