Case No. 09-cv-1173.United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Peoria Division.
January 20, 2010
OPINION and ORDER
JOE McDADE, Chief Judge
Before the court is Magistrate Judge Cudmore’s Report and Recommendation [Doc. 6] recommending that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff failed to serve Defendant with a summons and the Complaint within the time provided by Rule 4(m). The Plaintiff has not filed any objections within the ten (10) working days allotted by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to timely object constitutes a waiver of any objections. See Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739
(7th Cir. 1999); Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21 Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, this Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. CASE TERMINATED.
968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997) Annette M. ABRAHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AGUSTA, S.P.A, et al.,…
568 F.Supp. 692 (1983) Andreas PAPAFAGOS, et al. v. FIAT AUTO, S.p.A., et al. Civ.…
457 F.Supp.3d 313 (2020) ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., Defendant. 18-cv-5473…
228 F.Supp.3d 302 (2017) Lisa LEE, Plaintiff, v. AIR CANADA and John Doe, True Name…
Nov 1, 1939 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 1 F.R.D.…
Oct 15, 2001 · United States District Court for the District of Maine · No. CIV. 98-186-PH 203 F.R.D.…