JOHN HERNDON, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent.

C.A. No. 05-6044.United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.
August 7, 2006

ORDER
BARCLAY SURRICK, District Judge

AND NOW, this _____ day of ___________________, 2006, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Docket No. 2) and no Objections having been filed, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED as moot.

Page 1