CASE NO: 8:08-cv-1607-T-26MAP.United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division.
September 17, 2008
ORDER
RICHARD LAZZARA, District Judge
Upon due consideration, it is ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff’s Renewed Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Dkt. 25) is denied because at this juncture of the proceedings any request for injunctive relief must be sought under the auspices of Rule 65(a). Plaintiff’s Alternative Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 25) is also denied because Plaintiff has failed to provide the Court with the type of evidentiary record required by Local Rule 4.06(b)(1) from which the Court can make an informed decision as to whether Plaintiff can satisfy the four-part test for obtaining preliminary injunctive relief, especially as to the issue of whether there is a substantial likelihood that Plaintiff will prevail on the merits of its various claims.
DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida.