EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY v. AGFA-GEVAERT N.V. (W.D.N.Y. 2006)

02-CV-6564T.United States District Court, W.D. New York.
May 26, 2006

DECISION and ORDER
MICHAEL TELESCA, Senior District Judge

On April 20, 2006, Special Master Leif R. Sigmond, Jr. issued three separate Reports and Recommendations in this action. Neither party has filed objections to Reports One and Three, and accordingly, the parties have waived their rights to de novo
review of those Reports. See, e.g. Small v. Secretary ofHealth and Human Services, 892 F.2d 15 (2nd Cir. 1989) (“failure to object timely to a magistrate’s report operates as a waiver of any further judicial review of the magistrate’s decision).

I find that with respect to Reports One and Three, the Special Master appropriately determined the issues before him, and because there is no clear error in the Special Master’s Reports, I affirm and adopt Special Master Sigmond’s Reports numbered One and Three in their entirety.

ALL OF THE ABOVE IS SO ORDERED.

Page 1