CITY OF PARAGOULD, ARKANSAS v. WATKINS (E.D.Ark. 11-24-2009)

CITY OF PARAGOULD, ARKANSAS PLAINTIFF v. CONNIE BURNS WATKINS and DEFENDANTS/RICHARD WATKINS THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS v. MIKE GASKILL, et al. THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANTS.

3:09CV00172-WRW.United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Jonesboro Division.
November 24, 2009

ORDER
WILLIAM WILSON JR., District Judge

Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs’ Motion to Set Aside the Judgment Based on Fraud (Doc. No. 37) and Motion to Amend Findings, etc. (Doc. No. 39) are DENIED. Their request that the Court clarify who is appellant and appellee is DENIED as MOOT, because the Order remanding this case is not reviewable on appeal.[1]

Since this case was remanded to the Circuit Court of Greene County, Arkansas, Civil Division, on October 26, 2009, — nearly a month ago — the Clerk of the Court is directed to no longer accept filings from Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs in this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

[1] 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (“An order remanding a case to the State Court from which it was removed is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. . . .”).