CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY v. PIZARCHIK (Colo. 3-23-2011)

CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DINE CITIZENS AGAINST RUINING OUR ENVIRONMENT, and SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH PIZARCHIK, in his official capacity as Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, WESTERN REGION OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Interior, and KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as U.S. Secretary of Interior, Defendants.

Civil Action No. 11-cv-00243-REB-CBS.United States District Court, D. Colorado.
March 23, 2011

ORDER GRANTING BHP NAVAJO COAL COMPANY’S MOTION TO INTERVENE
CRAIG SHAFFER, Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER IS before the court on BHP Navajo Coal Company’s (BNCC’s) Motion to Intervene (doc # 12), filed March 21, 2011, through which BNCC seeks to intervene as a party defendant as of right under FED. R. CIV. P. 24(a)(2), or alternatively to intervene as a defendant by permission under FED. R. CIV. P. 24(b)(1)(B). The court has reviewed the motion and the entire case file, and finds that the court would have reached the same conclusion under either FED. R. CIV. P. 24(a)(2) or FED. R. CIV. P. 24(b)(1)(B) and that BNCC’s intervention will not unduly delay or prejudice the adjudication of the original parties’ rights. Accordingly:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the instant motion is GRANTED, and BHP Navajo Coal Company is permitted to intervene with full status as a party defendant. The Clerk of the Court shall amend the caption in this action to reflect the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that BHP Navajo Coal

Page 2

Company’s Answer to Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint for Review of Federal Agency Action (doc # 12-2), tendered to the court on March 21, 2011, is accepted for filing as of the date of this order.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

ABRAHAM v. AGUSTA, 968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997)

968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997) Annette M. ABRAHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AGUSTA, S.P.A, et al.,…

4 weeks ago

PAPAFAGOS v. FIAT AUTO, SpA, 568 F.Supp. 692 (1983)

568 F.Supp. 692 (1983) Andreas PAPAFAGOS, et al. v. FIAT AUTO, S.p.A., et al. Civ.…

4 weeks ago

ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., 457 F.Supp.3d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

457 F.Supp.3d 313 (2020) ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., Defendant. 18-cv-5473…

4 weeks ago

LEE v. AIR CANADA, 228 F.Supp.3d 302 (S.D.N.Y. 2017)

228 F.Supp.3d 302 (2017) Lisa LEE, Plaintiff, v. AIR CANADA and John Doe, True Name…

1 month ago

UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA, 1 F.R.D. 1 (1939)

Nov 1, 1939 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 1 F.R.D.…

1 month ago

RAMIREZ v. DECOSTER, 203 F.R.D. 30 (D. Ma. 2001)

Oct 15, 2001 · United States District Court for the District of Maine · No. CIV. 98-186-PH 203 F.R.D.…

1 month ago