Case No. 2:06-CV-01909-MMS.United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division.
April 7, 2009
ORDER
MARY SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge
On March 6, 2009, this court ordered the parties to show cause why this action should not be administratively stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2008), reh’g en banc granted, 527 F.3d 797 (9th Cir. 2008).
No party has filed a statement of opposition. Accordingly, this action is stayed pending final disposition of Hayward v.Marshall.
968 F.Supp. 1403 (1997) Annette M. ABRAHAM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AGUSTA, S.P.A, et al.,…
568 F.Supp. 692 (1983) Andreas PAPAFAGOS, et al. v. FIAT AUTO, S.p.A., et al. Civ.…
457 F.Supp.3d 313 (2020) ADVANCED WATER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. AMIAD U.S.A., INC., Defendant. 18-cv-5473…
228 F.Supp.3d 302 (2017) Lisa LEE, Plaintiff, v. AIR CANADA and John Doe, True Name…
Nov 1, 1939 · United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 1 F.R.D.…
Oct 15, 2001 · United States District Court for the District of Maine · No. CIV. 98-186-PH 203 F.R.D.…